IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/snr/mdrcmp/v11y2017i5p5-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert procedures and opportunities related with trial of antitrust cases

Author

Listed:
  • Knyazeva, I.

  • Bondarenko, I.

  • Paderina, K.

Abstract

The procedure (characteristics and stages) of engaging experts at different investigation (case consideration) phases is analyzed as part of FAS control-and-supervision efforts. The author proposes classification and types of expert examination performed by various expert entities considering antimonopoly cases. The balance between types of expert examinations and subject areas of antimonopoly regulation is determined. Motives of expert examination deviations during judicial procedures are given. The paper contains a summary of statistical analysis of judicial cases on competition law, where experts had to be engaged in 2010-2016. Changes in the case structure with engaging experts on the types of the law that falls under FAS competence, is shown. Information about judicial cases statistics is of special interest, in particular, on the cases won by the antimonopoly body or an economic entity depending on the party that provides an expert opinion. An analysis of the materials on the cases related to FAS work considered within the system of Arbitration Courts, allows to systematize and formulate a potential range of expert and analytical tasks, which can be given to experts (expert organizations) depending on the subject of case for judicial proceedings.

Suggested Citation

  • Knyazeva, I. & Bondarenko, I. & Paderina, K., 2017. "Expert procedures and opportunities related with trial of antitrust cases," Journal of Modern Competition, Synergy University, vol. 11(5), pages 5-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:v:11:y:2017:i:5:p:5-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.moderncompetition.ru/jour/article/view/769
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:v:11:y:2017:i:5:p:5-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Synergy University Maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/snrgunv.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.