IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/snr/mdrcmp/v10y2016i3p91-105.html

Assessment of the relationship of brand equity indicators and their role in the management of the business (for IT-companies)

Author

Listed:
  • Yagolnitser, M.

  • Kazantsev, K.

Abstract

The paper proposes a cognitive approach for the analysis of brand equity. It is assumed that the brand is an intangible asset, forming long-term effects of the business strategies of the company. The study does not attempt to select a specific set of measurer’s, which is solved in detail by many authors (Aaker, 1991, Wood 2006, Pitta, Katsanis, 1995, Burmann, Jost-Benz, Riley, 2009 Andreeva, Prokofiev, 2010 Tretyak 2001, Muravskiy et al., 2012 et al.). The purpose of research - to assess the relationship of brand equity with its individual measurer’s. The main tools of analysis is a favor model represented a weighted directed graph. It describes how to build a model based on an assessment of the adjacency matrix of a directed graph. Baseline data for evaluation were formed on the basis of the analysis of surveys of IT-products market experts (manufacturers, retailers, installers - the people responsible for the implementation of the final decision). The constructed model was calibrated and tested by comparing the valuation of brands of companies such as Hewlett Packard and IBM. Results were compared with the data promulgated by the company Interbrand. The results indicate that the proposed technical approach can be used for a comprehensive assessment of brand equity and its individual components - indicators of the perception of consumers and market indicators. Herewith indicators can be elaborated taking into account the peculiarities of the markets and the detail of consumer preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Yagolnitser, M. & Kazantsev, K., 2016. "Assessment of the relationship of brand equity indicators and their role in the management of the business (for IT-companies)," Journal of Modern Competition, Synergy University, vol. 10(3), pages 91-105.
  • Handle: RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:v:10:y:2016:i:3:p:91-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.moderncompetition.ru/jour/article/view/707
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:snr:mdrcmp:v:10:y:2016:i:3:p:91-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Synergy University Maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/snrgunv.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.