Author
Listed:
- Aleksandar Mihajlović
- Jelena Gajić
Abstract
In the digital marketing age, higher education institutions are increasingly utilizing social media platforms such as Instagram to enhance their visibility and attract prospective students. This study examines the cost-effectiveness of higher education institutions' Instagram marketing campaigns through A/B testing, focusing on different advertising formats with the same creative approaches. By comparing static images with animated images (in a video file format), the research confirms that carousel ads are more cost-efficient and generate higher engagement rates than Video ads. Specifically, carousel ads achieved significantly higher Click-through rates (CTR) by both impressions and reach, outperforming video ads by a wide margin. The analysis indicates that campaigns using static image format are more cost-effective, demonstrating lower Costs per click (CPC), Cost per landing page view (CPLPV), and Cost per registration (CPR). Moreover, the study emphasizes that carousel posts outperform video ads significantly relating to the return on ad spend (ROAS), with carousel campaigns achieving approximately 29.9% higher returns. The findings underscore the importance of audience segmentation, noting that different age groups and genders respond variably to marketing efforts. Despite some limitations, such as sample size and timeframe, the results validate the study's conclusions and underscore the effectiveness of Carousel posts in strengthening institutional image and engagement. This study offers important insights and perspectives for refining and optimizing Instagram marketing strategies in higher education, that can contribute to increasing enrollment and institutional visibility.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sng:ejae01:221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EJAE Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.singidunum.ac.rs/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.