IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sng/ejae01/215.html

Comparative Analysis of the Kranjska Gora and Zlatibor Tourism Destinations' Competitiveness in Function of Improving the Tourism Offer

Author

Listed:
  • Katarina Bjelić
  • Aleksandra Vujko
  • Aleksa Panić

Abstract

The initial hypothesis of the work was the assumption that Zlatibor has potential for sustainable tourism development, but that the tourism destination Zlatibor is still not sufficiently competitive with the tourism destination Kranjska Gora. The research presents the key features of these areas, and their attractive tourism offers, through a comparative analysis. Also, this paper deals with the chances for the development of sustainable tourism, as well as the improvement of tourist services, specifically Zlatibor, bearing in mind that the Kranjska region is in a much better position, as far as the implementation of the concept of green tourism development. The research was conducted using a modified Integrated Model of Destination Competitiveness (IMDC) model, seeking responses from stakeholders from both Zlatibor and Kranjska Gora (259). Bearing in mind that the responses of stakeholders from Slovenia showed consistently higher values in the assessment of destination competitiveness, the starting hypothesis proved to be correct, and in response to that, guidelines were given for improving competitiveness and overcoming certain threats observed in the research results.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:sng:ejae01:215
DOI: 10.5937/EJAE21-50045
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://journal.singidunum.ac.rs/paper/comparative-analysis-of-the-kranjska-gora-and-zlatibor-tourism-destinations-competitiveness-in-function-of-improving-the-tourism-offer
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5937/EJAE21-50045?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sng:ejae01:215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EJAE Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.singidunum.ac.rs/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.