IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sng/ejae01/214.html

Fair Value Recognition – Polish Accountants Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Luty
  • Katarzyna Piotrowska
  • Angelika Kaczmarczyk

Abstract

The paper aims to explore accountants' attitudes toward fair value measurements. The sample consists of Polish accountants with various working places and practical experiences. The authors assumed no difference in fair value recommendations between accountants. The authors considered a difference in the practical use of fair value models in accountants with more extended experience and the workplace. The methods of analysis of sources (literature), deductive reasoning, and survey research were used. The study used a questionnaire addressed to Polish accountants. The results confirmed that most accountants, regardless of gender, working place or length of experience, recommended a fair value method for improving the credibility of financial figures. Despite the recommendation, more experienced accountants and accountants working in accounting offices mostly use historical cost methods instead of fair value methods. It was verified by analyzing the correlation between the valuation approach and the specific solutions adopted for determining depreciation charges and valuing financial liabilities. The main restriction concerns that the quantitative study was preliminary and refers only to Polish accountants. The article fills the research gap in preferable valuation methods regarding the gender, working places and practical experiences of the person responsible for accounting.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:sng:ejae01:214
DOI: 10.5937/EJAE21-49589
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://journal.singidunum.ac.rs/paper/fair-value-recognition-polish-accountants-perspective
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5937/EJAE21-49589?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sng:ejae01:214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EJAE Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.singidunum.ac.rs/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.