IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/smo/journl/v6y2021i2p7-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Assessment of Nigeria’s 2020 #EndSars Protests and a Comparative Analysis with US’s Black Lives Matter Protests

Author

Listed:
  • Hadiza Isa Wada

    (Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Nigeria)

Abstract

A social mobilization effort by the Nigerian youth against police brutality introduced via Twitter in 2017 turned into one of the largest youth protests in October 2020, when the hashtag #EndSars rattled the foundations of Nigeria as a unified nation. While some scholars claim that the protest seems to echo and borrow from the sympathies of the US’s Black Lives Matter movement, another movement against police brutality with a decentralized network of activists which began in July 2013 and also peaked somewhat during the pandemic era of 2020, the #EndSars effect on national security, politics, and socio-economic lives of Nigerians, however, appear deeper and far reaching. This study compared the two movements regarding police brutality, uncovered the nuances of the #EndSars movement, the factors that led to its deeper impact, and lessons to learn from the experience. A survey of Nigerian undergraduate students, was conducted and the data analysed using the social movement theory. Except for the differences in their historical development, the findings from the conduct of the two protests show significant similarities. The student’s survey, in particular, shows that while the respondents support the original demands for a call to action by the #EndSars organizers at 84%, they did not, however, believe the violence and destruction were justifiable (at 59.7%). Also interesting was their response that they believed (at 73% of respondents) that the movement was influenced by US’s Black Lives Matter.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadiza Isa Wada, 2021. "An Assessment of Nigeria’s 2020 #EndSars Protests and a Comparative Analysis with US’s Black Lives Matter Protests," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 7-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:6:y:2021:i:2:p:7-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/97
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/97/91
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:6:y:2021:i:2:p:7-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.