IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/smo/journl/v6y2021i1p88-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Fiction in the Light of the Four Principles of Classical Logic

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Neacsiu

    (Andrei Radulescu Law Research Institute of Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The succession of logical forms being a facet of the otherness of time, the subsumption of materiality, and especially of conceptuality to different logical patterns become a truism that wears the garment of a logical evolutionary process. By this, it is imperative to undertake a logical-philosophical analysis on some conceptual entities that show traces of ancestry, in the sense of researching their logical permanence. The concordance with the temporality of this research demands, as essence, the research of the logical permanency related to that logicae prima facias. The latter prima facias as a logical pattern must imperatively be represented by the logical entity that has the value of ab initio point on the scale of temporality, namely the classical logic. Considering an ab initio conjugated homologous point, but which designates the source of fictionality in the field of law, we conclude that the legitimacies, functionalities, respectively subtleties of the principal pattern of classical logic that is incident in the conceptuality of legal fiction must be investigated in order to conclude over the actuality of this abstract construct of law-part of legal reality, as well as on the actuality of the precepts of classical logic as prima facias logicae.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Neacsiu, 2021. "Legal Fiction in the Light of the Four Principles of Classical Logic," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 6(1), pages 88-112, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:88-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/90
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/90/84
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:88-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.