IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/smo/journl/v3y2018i2p62-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Codes of Business Ethics Ethical?

Author

Listed:
  • Willy Tadjudje

    (University of Luxembourg)

  • Clément Labi

    (University of Luxembourg)

Abstract

In response to a quickly evolving legal environment and more generally to changing conceptions about the role and responsibilities of the corporation and its executives, many firms have adopted codes of ethics whose legal relevance is uncertain, and whose relation to actual ethics is largely problematic. First, it is necessary to analyze the theoretical model of these codes, as business environments tend to be assessed in terms of “business ethics†, which is conceptually difficult not to discount, since ethics should possess a universalist vocation, hence the necessity to seek whether there could be a variety of ethics which could bear the same validity. More generally, can individuals (or corporations) bestow upon themselves any set of chosen ethical rules? We propose that ethical codes actually mimic and anticipate what legislators or judges have (or will have) considered as ethical behaviors. Since the law is itself an imitation of ethical rules, codes of business ethics are therefore imitations of imitations. The works of Kant and Levinas, in particular, will serve as points of reference.

Suggested Citation

  • Willy Tadjudje & Clément Labi, 2018. "Are Codes of Business Ethics Ethical?," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 62-73, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:62-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/60/43
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/download/60/43
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:62-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.