IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/smo/journl/v10y2025i2p245-252.html

Why Pray? Theological and Empirical Perspectives on a Universal Human Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Cha

    (Bergen Catholic High School, Oradell, NJ, USA)

Abstract

Prayer carries a unique epistemological and anthropological space at the center of theology, philosophy, and diverse social sciences. Throughout civilizations and traditions—from Abrahamic faiths to Dharmic systems—prayer has remained a universal mode of vital human expression, highlighting a consistent impulse toward transcendence. This paper examines the phenomenon of prayer as an expression that extends beyond devotional practice. Prayer can be seen as an intricate cultural artifact with theological, historical, psychological, and even biomedical impact. With references to a range of scriptures, such as the Lord’s Prayer in Christianity, the Shema in Judaism, and the Salah in Islam, with additional references to cross-cultural analogues in Quaker, Hindu, and other cultures and religions, this paper aims to examine prayer’s structural commonalities and divergences in functionality. The research includes insights from theologians, such as C.S. Lewis, Martin Buber, and Timothy Keller, paired with empirical studies in order to highlight both subjective and discrete results of prayer. By examining Bertrand Russell’s scientistic dismissal of prayer, this paper argues that prayer’s significance cannot be minimized to empirical efficacy; instead, it resides in its core ability to cultivate relationality, humility, and existential orientation toward transcendence. From a larger perspective, the paper argues that prayer’s relevance across temporal, cultural, and ideological boundaries illustrates a universal human need for connection with the transcendent—a necessity that contradicts the reduction to materialist frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Cha, 2025. "Why Pray? Theological and Empirical Perspectives on a Universal Human Practice," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 245-252, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:245-252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/354
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/354/261
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:245-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.