IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/smo/journl/v10y2025i1p454-467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GeoAI and Urban Justice: An Equity-Centered Governance Model for Redeveloping the Gowanus Canal

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Yarish

    (Capital Technical University, United States)

Abstract

The rapid redevelopment of New York City's Gowanus Canal neighborhood poses a critical question: Can geospatial artificial intelligence be governed in a way that promotes environmental justice, or will it exacerbate urban inequities through eco-gentrification? This conceptual paper introduces the Equity-Centered GeoAI Governance Model, which combines algorithmic fairness audits, affordability safeguards, and participatory oversight to address displacement risks associated with AI-driven zoning. Using the Gowanus Canal as an illustrative case, the paper situates local dynamics within broader international examples—including Amsterdam, Helsinki, and Vienna—which demonstrate partial but incomplete advances in transparency, affordability, and community participation. The framework synthesizes lessons from urban planning theory, critical geography, and digital governance to propose a three-phase policy roadmap: (1) transparent auditing of algorithmic zoning tools; (2) mandatory affordability mechanisms, such as Community Land Trusts; and (3) robust resident engagement via open data and digital democracy platforms. While conceptual in scope, this model highlights pathways for cities to align smart urban redevelopment with social equity goals and suggests directions for future empirical testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Yarish, 2025. "GeoAI and Urban Justice: An Equity-Centered Governance Model for Redeveloping the Gowanus Canal," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 454-467, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:454-467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/325
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/325/229
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:454-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.