Author
Listed:
- Morgan Foos
(Tiffin University, United States)
- Hieu Phan
(Morningside University, United States)
Abstract
This study investigates student perceptions of the effectiveness of online learning compared to traditional in-person instruction, with a specific focus on the moderating effects of gender and academic major. Employing a 2x2 factorial research design, the study surveyed male and female students majoring in criminal justice and non-criminal justice disciplines at a small Midwestern university. A total of 40 participants completed a Likert-scale questionnaire measuring four dimensions: Instructor and Course Delivery, Engagement and Interaction, Learning Outcomes and Perceived Effectiveness, and Technology and Resources. Following approval by the Institutional Review Board, survey distribution was conducted electronically via email. Descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests were used to analyze the data. Results revealed statistically significant differences in student perceptions across gender and academic discipline, with notable disparities observed in the categories of Technology and Resources and Instructor and Course Delivery. Female students, particularly those majoring in criminal justice, reported consistently more favorable perceptions of their online learning experiences than their male and non-criminal justice peers. These findings emphasize the influence of demographic variables on student satisfaction and perceived efficacy in digital learning environments, and they suggest the importance of developing targeted instructional strategies and technological support systems to address diverse learner needs.
Suggested Citation
Morgan Foos & Hieu Phan, 2025.
"The Efficacy of Digital Education: A Data-Driven Analysis of Online Learning Outcomes,"
Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 394-405, July.
Handle:
RePEc:smo:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:394-405
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:394-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.