Symposium on Future Productivity Growth in Canada: An Introduction
In this introduction, Andrew Sharpe provides the context for the Symposium on Future Productivity Growth in Canada, a panel organized by the CSLS at the Canadian Economics Association Meetings, June 2003 at Carleton University. He provides a context for the presentations by highlighting certain issues related to the topic not directly addressed in the symposium. Total hours worked is a more accurate measure of labour input than persons employed, so that when data on hours are available, an hours-based aggregate labour productivity measure is preferable to a worker-based measure. An important reason for choosing the total economy as the appropriate measure of aggregate labour productivity is that the potential for real income gains is determined by economy-wide aggregate productivity increases, but the business sector accounts for only around three quarters of total economy output. Small increases in productivity over long time periods and the real income gains these generate have extremely favourable consequences for the affordability of social programs. Finally, while the contributors to the symposium reach a consensus of 2 per cent per year labour productivity growth in Canada over the next 25 years, there is no such consensus in the broader economics profession, with some forecasters alternatively predicting labour productivity growth as low as 1.6 per cent per year.
Volume (Year): 7 (2003)
Issue (Month): (Fall)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 151 Slater Street, Suite 710, Ottawa, ON K1P 5H3|
Web page: http://www.csls.ca/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Web: http://www.csls.ca Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:7:y:2003:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CSLS)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask CSLS to update the entry or send us the correct email address
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.