IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v37y20193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Import Competition Reduce Domestic Innovation? Evidence from the China Shock and Firm-level Data on Canadian Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Myeongwan Kim

Abstract

A key economic issue in Canada is the declining business research and development in manufacturing since the early 2000s. Accompanying this, total factor productivity (TFP) growth in manufacturing slowed after 2000. To deepen our understanding of this phenomenon, we focus on the increasing Chinese import share in the total domestic absorption in Canadian manufacturing since the early 2000s, which appears to be driven by positive supply shocks within Chinese manufacturing. Based on firm-level data in Canadian manufacturing, we find that rising Chinese import competition led to declines in R&D expenditure and TFP growth within firms but reallocated employment towards more productive firms and induced less productive firms to exit. The negative within-effects were pronounced for firms that were initially smaller, less profitable, and less productive. At the aggregate level, the positive reallocation effects on TFP more than offset the negative within-effect. We estimate that, had there been no increase in Chinese import competition between 2005 and 2010, TFP in Canadian manufacturing would have declined by 1.26 per cent per year instead of the actual 1.09 per cent per year over this period.

Suggested Citation

  • Myeongwan Kim, 2019. "Does Import Competition Reduce Domestic Innovation? Evidence from the China Shock and Firm-level Data on Canadian Manufacturing," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 37, pages 40-95, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:37:y:2019:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.csls.ca/ipm/37/Kim.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Import competition; Innovation; China; Canada; Firm-level analysis; Productivity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F61 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Microeconomic Impacts
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:37:y:2019:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.