IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sko/yrbook/v24y2025i1p215-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development Of The Concept For Business Process Management (Bpm). Traditional Vs. Social Bpm

Author

Listed:
  • Ina Petrova-Gancheva

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski)

Abstract

Business process management (BPM) has become a central topic in business and academia, as organizations are constantly challenged to achieve better results. Often, the process approach is the key to reaching those results. BPM practices are already common in many industries. However, in many cases, the BPM approach is implemented ad hoc, mainly by introducing only the BPM software without coordinating such initiatives with the whole organizational strategy. To fill this gap, this article summarizes the established theoretical perspectives and current trends in the research on BPM to gain a holistic view of it. The paper gives an overview of the BPM definition, and elements, distinguishes between different process types, and aims to systematically synthesize the main points in the evolution of BPM concepts. It also compares the traditional and the social BPM approaches from a management perspective, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each. Managers and scholars can consult the paper to choose the BPM approach that best suits their organizations. The article concludes with suggestions for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ina Petrova-Gancheva, 2025. "Development Of The Concept For Business Process Management (Bpm). Traditional Vs. Social Bpm," Yearbook of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria, vol. 24(1), pages 215-230, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sko:yrbook:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:215-230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.feba.uni-sofia.bg/sko/yrbook/Yearbook24-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sko:yrbook:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:215-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Teodor Sedlarski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fesofbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.