IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sko/yrbook/v17y2019i1p187-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Poverty In Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Teodora Peneva

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski)

Abstract

There is no an official definition of energy poverty in the European Union. The European Commission considers a European definition unsuitable, due to the different situations of energy consumers in the member countries. As such, definitions are decided at country level. As of the end of 2015, there were only four countries in Europe with official definitions of energy poverty, according to a report of Insight_E to the Commission. Bulgaria has no definition. There is only a mechanism for protection of vulnerable consumers, which represent 7% of the population. There are over 22% of the population living under the official poverty line in 2016. Energy poverty in Bulgaria has not been estimated using any of the official definitions used in other countries so far, by none of the authoritative institutions. The only frequently cited source is this of Eurostat, stating that about 67% of the population in the country is not able to afford its basic needs of heating in 2014. This, however, is the subjective assessment of the households. The article shows objective assessment of the energy poverty using data from the Household Budget Survey of the National Statistical Institute from 2014. Results show, that there were 10% of the population being energy poor in Bulgaria using the LIHC method, about 35% of the population using the 'Poverty after fuel cost' method, 52% of the population using the 'Minimal income standard' method, and 64% using the 'Ten percent rule' method. The different methods benefit different target groups, and are influenced differently by the different factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Teodora Peneva, 2019. "Energy Poverty In Bulgaria," Yearbook of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria, vol. 17(1), pages 187-210, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sko:yrbook:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:187-210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.feba.uni-sofia.bg/sko/yrbook/Yearbook17-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sko:yrbook:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:187-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Teodor Sedlarski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fesofbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.