IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v9y2020i1p44-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explicit And Implicit Unamendable Constitutional Provisions From The Perspective Of The Kosovo Constitution

Author

Listed:
  • Luz Balaj

    (Teaching assistant at University of Prishtina, LL.M on Rule of Law at Ohio Northern University, USA)

Abstract

This paper reviews the debate over the power of the constitutional amendment in Kosovo, by primarily dealing with two forms via which it is manifested:.namely, norms that explicitly define their unamendability and norms that the court of constitutional jurisdiction has identified as unamendable in their implicit nature. To reach that objective, the paper proceeds as following: it first reviews the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court to review draft-constitutional amendments, and the criteria on which it may rule. Thereafter, the paper explains how certain amendments conform to the explicit prohibitions on amendability present in the constitution. The paper than continues further by deconstructing the constitutional court's contribution in identifying the unamendability of the constitutional norm with an implicit nature. This is primarily considered from the perspective of landmark judgments of the Constitutional Court, which, as will be seen, have contributed to the expansion of the Court’s review power as well as the material criteria governing the limitations on the power of constitutional amendment.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz Balaj, 2020. "Explicit And Implicit Unamendable Constitutional Provisions From The Perspective Of The Kosovo Constitution," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 9(1), pages 44-53, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:44-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.adjuris.ro/revista/articole/an9nr1/5.%20Luj%20Balaj.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    unconstitutional amendments; explicit-implicit unamendability; constitutional court; constitutional jurisdiction; human rights.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K30 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - General
    • K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:44-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.