Author
Abstract
We have learned to shape solutions through the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights or the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg on what, until not long ago, we were treating an eternal lamentation as a real problem but without a concrete solution have set or reached important standards in the segment of violence against minors and women but have also provided an adequate degree of protection for professionals directly involved in verifying domestic violence complaints. However, with the entry into force of Law no. 174/2018 regarding the modification and completion of the Law no. 217/2003 on the prevention and combating of domestic violence, the role of the police officer in the exercise of his duties in preventing and limiting domestic violence is strengthened by defining and enumerating the means by which he has the right to obtain evidence by stating his obligations and prohibitions may have immediate application in the content of the provisional protection order but also by reglating the way of its confirmation by administrative resolution issued by the prosecutor. The objectives of the present study, however, concern how this legislative measure is to be reflected in the organizational procedures necessary for the implementation in practice of police, prosecutor's offices and courts, all set in a framework that will procedurally support the efforts to investigate and conclude, in a way that effectively contributes to the diminution or elimination of an imminent risk.
Suggested Citation
Camelia Daciana Stoian & Radu Nicolae Stoian, 2019.
"Role And Practical Attitudes In Issue Of The Provisional Protection Order,"
Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 8(1), pages 136-139, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sja:journl:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:136-139
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
- K36 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Family and Personal Law
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:136-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.