IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Withdrawal From The European Union According To Art. 50 Of The Treaty Of Lisbon. Practical Application – Brexit

Listed author(s):
  • Adriana Deac

    ()

    (Law Department, Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Registered author(s):

    Lisbon Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union regulates Article 50 posbilitatea Member States to withdraw voluntarily respecting national constitutional provisions. BREXIT (Britain and exit) is the term that has been named Britain's withdrawal from the European Union. Following a consultative referendum held in the UK in June 2016 52% of the votes cast were in favor of leaving the EU. The new prime minister of Great Britain, Theresa May announced that by the end of March 2017 the government he leads will invoke Article 50 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, triggering the formal withdrawal, it will be finalized by in late March 2019. Beyond the political and economic implications, unprecedented in the perste 60 years of the Eu ropean Union (including the three European Communities), the procedure of withdrawal from the European Union and Brexit site raises a number of legal issues, uniqueness being the consequence of the that such a procedure has never been used again anyway not in this form, on the one hand and, on the other hand, it is a state belonging to the system of common law based on judicial precedent which, in this case , does not exist.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://businesslawconference.ro/revista/articole/an5nr1/Art.%205%20Adriana%20Deac.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences) in its journal “Perspectives of Business Law” Journal.

    Volume (Year): 5 (2016)
    Issue (Month): 1 (November)
    Pages: 29-32

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:29-32
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    6 ROMANA PLACE, 70167 - BUCHAREST

    Phone: 0040-01-2112650
    Fax: 0040-01-3129549
    Web page: http://www.adjuris.ro/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:29-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Catalin-Silviu Sararu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.