IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v2y2013i1p96-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Copyright On The Intellectual Property Expert Report. Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Raul Sorin Fântâna

    (Faculty of International Economic Relations, Christian University "Dimitrie Cantemir", Brasov, Romania)

Abstract

Currently, according to the law, the expert is treated as a witness, and the expertise - presented as a report - is treated as a work implemented in support of justice only. Referring to the intellectual property, an expert report is often a research work with pronounced character of investigation. According to the copyright law, such a unique work should be cited even in the court device resolution, scientifically commented, as bibliographical source. The immediate consequence in support of the act of justice is that, unlike the jurisprudence - which in many countries is not a source of law, having an informative character only, a written report - especially the technical work – cannot be commented by any court. Evaluated as technical work, an expert report on the one hand should be treated as such - cited - by the courts of law and on the other hand implemented according to the rules imposed in the scientific works: documented, with a minimum number of references to and quotations from serious sources, including previous expert reports from completed files. We think that such an approach of the expert report would lead to a significant improvement of the justice act at least in Business Law.

Suggested Citation

  • Raul Sorin Fântâna, 2013. "The Copyright On The Intellectual Property Expert Report. Consequences," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 2(1), pages 96-100, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:96-100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.businesslawconference.ro/revista/articole/an2nr1/13%20Fantana%20Raul%20EN.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    technical expert report; res interpreted; intellectual-industrial property; technical work; technical jurisprudence; standardization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:96-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.