IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v2y2013i1p143-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Thoughts On The Interrelation Of Article 7 Teu With The Eu Fundamental Rights Agency

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos Margaritis

    () (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Much have been written, critically evaluating the sanction mechanism included in article 7 TEU regarding the sanctions to member states for serious and persistent breach of the values of the Union. Although the institutional framework is adequate and its use necessary, the lack of political will has led to inactivity of the provision. On the other hand, the fundamental rights agency was established for monitoring human rights throughout the Union, in order to ensure full respect for fundamental rights across the EU. The aim of this paper is to present an interrelation between the sanction mechanism of article 7 TEU with the monitoring mechanism of the agency, which will enhance the quality of fundamental rights protection in EU and the member states. The paper is based on interim conclusions from the PhD thesis at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, entitled “the Treaty of Lisbon and the fundamental rights protection in EU”.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos Margaritis, 2013. "Some Thoughts On The Interrelation Of Article 7 Teu With The Eu Fundamental Rights Agency," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 2(1), pages 143-147, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:143-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.businesslawconference.ro/revista/articole/an2nr1/21%20Margaritis%20Konstantinos.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    article 7 TEU; sanction mechanism; fundamental rights agency;

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:143-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Catalin-Silviu Sararu). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.