IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

A Strategy To Improve The Macroeconomic Forecasts Accuracy In Romania

Listed author(s):

In this article, the accuracy of forecasts for inflation rate, unemployment, exchange rate and GDP index provided by Institute of Economic Forecasting (IEF) and National Commission of Prognosis (NCP) was assessed for the forecasting horizon 2004-2011. The hypothesis that combined forecasts is a suitable strategy of improving the predictions accuracy was tested. Only for the unemployment rate the combined forecasts based on IEF and NCP evaluations performed better than the initial forecasts. For inflation and exchange rate Dobrescu model of IEF provided better predictions, but the combined ones were more accurate than NCP expectations. The Dobrescu model predictions combined with ARMA static respectively dynamic forecasts and NCP estimations combined with ARMA static prognosis, respectively Dobrescu forecasts using EQ scheme for unemployment on a horizon of 2 years (2010-2011) improved the accuracy of forecasts made by both institutions, the combined predictions based on Dobrescu predictions and ARMA static ones using OPT scheme being the most accurate, according to U1 Theils’ statistic.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Accounting and Financial Management Constanta in its journal Journal of Academic Research in Economics.

Volume (Year): 4 (2012)
Issue (Month): 3 (December) ()
Pages: 293-309

in new window

Handle: RePEc:shc:jaresh:v:4:y:2012:i:3:p:293-309
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:shc:jaresh:v:4:y:2012:i:3:p:293-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Claudiu Chiru)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.