IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/pzwzuw/v10i38y2012p204-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate architecture evaluation methods (Metody oceny architektur korporacyjnych)

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Dudycz

    (Instytut Informatyki Ekonomicznej, Katedra Technologii Informacyjnych, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wroclawiu)

Abstract

The paper presents selected problems of economic effectiveness evaluation of telework implementation for IT teams in the public sector institutions. Telework is a form of employment which can be successfully used in most of IT activities and professions. In need for rationalizing constantly growing labor costs it is necessary to implement telework programs in IT teams, also in public institutions. The author presented a methodological background for a study on economic efficiency of such programs based on the Cost-Benefits Analysis (CBA). Estimates of expected benefits are based on Key Goal Indicators (KGI) and Key Performance Indicators (KPI) recommended in the PO7 Manage IT Human Resources process of the COBIT® 4.1 model (Control Objectives for Information and related Technology). The suggested approach is then verified on a real example for IT telework program implemented in a large public institution, and selected detailed effectiveness assessments are included in this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Dudycz, 2012. "Corporate architecture evaluation methods (Metody oceny architektur korporacyjnych)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 10(38), pages 204-218.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:10:i:38:y:2012:p:204-218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/dyczkowski.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:10:i:38:y:2012:p:204-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.