IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/jbfeuw/v2y2023i20p1-29.html

Application of Chow, Cusum and Rolling Window in Testing Stability of Systematic Risk of Companies Listed in WIG-ESG in 2019–2022

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Mikolajek-Gocejna

    (SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Institute of Value Management, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze the stability of beta coeffi cients of companies listed in WIG-ESG. There are many studies on the stability of companies’ systematic risk, but the literature and research lack an analysis of the stability of the beta coeffi cient for ESG companies. We examined beta coeffi cients for 57 companies listed in WIG-ESG, established for sets of daily rates of return between September 3, 2019, to June 6, 2022 (period including COVID-19 crisis and asset price infl ation, Russian invasion of Ukraine). We estimate the beta coeffi cient for the whole as a result of which we obtain the average value of the beta coeffi cient over the entire analyzed period, and subperiods with fi xed length rolling window, resulting in a time series of beta coeffi cients. To assess beta stability, we used the Chow test with the F statistic, the Cusum test based on generalized fl uctuations test framework, and the Wald-Wolfowitz runs test of randomness around the mean for the time series beta oefficients obtained in the rolling window. The considered tests argue for the instability of the time series of beta coeffi cients in most of the companies tested: 93% short-term instability cases confi rmed by the Chow test, 100% short-term instability cases confi rmed by the Wald-Wolfowitz runs test. The paper is an initial attempt to bridge the gap that presently exists between the theoretical and empirical literature on the stability of ESG companies’ systematic risk. It cannot be ruled out (hypothesis) that the beta coeffi cient for companies listed in the WIG-ESG index is/will be stable over longer periods of time

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Mikolajek-Gocejna, 2023. "Application of Chow, Cusum and Rolling Window in Testing Stability of Systematic Risk of Companies Listed in WIG-ESG in 2019–2022," Journal of Banking and Financial Economics, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(20), pages 1-29.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgm:jbfeuw:v:2:y:2023:i:20:p:1-29
    DOI: 10.7172/2353-6845.jbfe.2023.2.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://press.wz.uw.edu.pl/jbfe/vol2023/iss20/1/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7172/2353-6845.jbfe.2023.2.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:jbfeuw:v:2:y:2023:i:20:p:1-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.