IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/annals/i40y2016p243-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role analityka biznesowego – standard ITIL versus BABOK

Author

Listed:
  • Jerzy Leyk

Abstract

The paper presents different scopes and definitions of business analysis and business analysts, that is actions and people situated between the business requiring new solutions and the IT delivering them. As a set of best practices, BABOK® is a de facto standard in this area. Similarly, ITIL® has a role as a standard from IT services delivery and IT management perspectives. Business analysis is a subject that falls under the scope of services design, implementation and delivery, therefore both standards may be analysed and compared in this area. It turns out that different perspectives underlying both standards are relevant not only for the language of presentation of business analysis issues but, first of all, for the contents. The roles of a business analyst, both in the narrow and broad sense, is the key to identifying and understanding the differences. A part of the conclusions focuses on the identification of ITIL® weaknesses and the possibility of adapting BABOK® achievements. Another conclusion indicates the underestimated role of soft skills of business analysts in both standards, especially in the case of the dehumanised, technology-oriented ITIL®.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerzy Leyk, 2016. "Role analityka biznesowego – standard ITIL versus BABOK," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 40, pages 243-256.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:40:y:2016:p:243-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rocznikikae.sgh.waw.pl/p/roczniki_kae_z40_17.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:40:y:2016:p:243-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Bernardelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.