IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/rebelj/v58i2y2013p115-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Closer View at the Patient Surgery Planning and Scheduling Problem: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • M. Samudra
  • E. Demeulemeester
  • B. Cardoen

Abstract

Hospitals are under growing pressure to cut costs, meanwhile sustaining the level of service provided to the patients. One part of the solution to this difficult task is to improve the efficiency of the operating rooms by using a sound patient scheduling framework. This can be done by identifying and applying good operations research methods from the healthcare literature. This literature review tries to help the reader to achieve this goal, firstly by pointing out relevant articles and, secondly by identifying and describing some of the major research groups in the field. Each research group is approaching the patient planning problem in a different way as, for example, some groups look at timing decisions such as finding an appropriate surgery date (e.g., Dec. 16) or time (e.g., 11:30) for a patient, whereas some include decisions regarding the surgery location, that is, determining an appropriate operating room. We found that seven major research groups are focusing on patient scheduling related problems and that their findings can be highly relevant to achieve a better and more efficiently used operating room. Reading about the research groups hopefully helps the reader, on the one hand, to get an overview over the patient planning literature and, on the other hand, to identify useful methods.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Samudra & E. Demeulemeester & B. Cardoen, 2013. "A Closer View at the Patient Surgery Planning and Scheduling Problem: A Literature Review," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 58(2), pages 115-140, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sen:rebelj:v:58:i:2:y:2013:p:115-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:rebelj:v:58:i:2:y:2013:p:115-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rebel-journal.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.