IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/journl/v12i4y2011p357-371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unbundling of Non-Profitable Rail Infrastructures

Author

Listed:
  • H-J- Weiss

Abstract

So far the unbundling debate in the European railroad sector has concentrated on the vertical relationship between train services and rail infrastructures. This paper argues that besides this important vertical dimension there is also an important horizontal dimension of the unbundling topic in the railroad sector, namely the distinction between profitable and non-profitable rail infrastructures. The addition of the horizontal dimension is necessary to capture a special feature of the railroad sector (at least in Europe): its significant financing out of public budgets. The paper analyzes in which way unbundling of non-profitable rail infrastructures can contribute to the solution of the market power problem in the railroad sector. Two economic criteria for disaggregating the parts of a railroad system are presented: competitiveness and profitability. The two regulatory problems caused by market power are discussed. The discrimination problem exists for all rail infrastructures, irrespective of their profitability, whereas the price level problem is absent for non-profitable ones. To avoid excessive or insufficient price regulation, the implementation of horizontal accounting separation is recommended. Finally, it is argued that accounting separation to tackle the market power problem will also contribute to the solution of the procurement problem in case of subsidized rail infrastructures.

Suggested Citation

  • H-J- Weiss, 2011. "Unbundling of Non-Profitable Rail Infrastructures," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 12(4), pages 357-371, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:12:i:4:y:2011:p:357-371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:12:i:4:y:2011:p:357-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.crninet.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.