Should Shareholders Be Entitled To A Vote On Executive Compensation? A Critical Survey
Corporate scandals within the last two decades have shown that good corporate control systems are not only a moral claim but also an economic need. A mechanism of corporate governance currently in the spotlight is “say-on-pay”, a form of shareholder activism that represents the capacity of shareholders to vote on executive compensation policies. Proponents of implementing “say-on-pay” by law argue that it is the existence of an “executive compensation problem”, jointly with different political and social arguments, what justifies legislative intervention. In this study, we discuss some economic reasons that minimize the appeal to entitle shareholders to a vote on executive compensation.
Volume (Year): 20 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.usc.es/econo/RGE/benvidag.htm
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdo:regaec:v:20:y:2011:i:1_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ana Iglesias Casal)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.