IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/pnoeeq/191a2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Captive As An Insurance Formula For Risk Management: Advantages And Disadvantages

Author

Listed:
  • R. Holly

    (The Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Socio-Economics Policy, Warsaw, Poland)

  • E. Greszta

Abstract

This article introduces subject of an insurance captive entity, with focus on how it could be used as insurance formula for risk management. Captive might be the most appropriate insurance formula for risk management. However, the level of achieved success depends on many factors.Insurance captive sare understood as entities which are formed and owned by companies mostly for the purpose of insuring own risks (pure captive or single parent captive). More and more often captives are also formed by a group of companies (group captives) to insure their properties and liabilities towards 3rd parties. Captives are widely used by many companies nowadays. However, many of them, are used solely for a purpose of a risk cession and premium transfer, with an intention to use captives more as a profit center in a low taxation country rather than for the purpose of risk management (i.e. a more appropriate role for captive would be to support their owners in enterprise risk management – ERM). This article touches on why captives are not used to their full potential. It may be too challenging for many decision makers to embrace on captives as risk management formula and extend captives' roles to utilize all possible advantages resulting from owning a captive. Captive can deliver risk management in a more comprehensive way than most commercial insurers on the market. The article also presents advantages and disadvantages of owning an insurance captive.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Holly & E. Greszta, 2017. "Captive As An Insurance Formula For Risk Management: Advantages And Disadvantages," Вестник Киевского национального университета имени Тараса Шевченко. Экономика., Socionet;Киевский национальный университет имени Тараса Шевченко, vol. 2(191), pages 17-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:pnoeeq:191a2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://spz.socionet.ru/~visnyk/files/191_17-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:pnoeeq:191a2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ганна Харламова). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.