IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/mngsci/y2018i1p90-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Каузальная классификация бизнес-процессов предприятия // Causal Сlassification of Enterprise Business

Author

Listed:
  • A. Ryzhko L.

    (Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University))

  • А. Рыжко Л.

    (ФГБОУ ВО «Московский авиационный институт» (Национальный исследовательский университет))

Abstract

Subject. The justified classification gives a chance to identify the research objects easier and more complex. That is why classifications are the basis of the most practical artificial systems structure, since combining and description of the individual components relationships requires a clear understanding of the essence of these components, their properties and typical accessories.Purpose. Enterprise business processes engineering, their formation as a system is also based on the classification. But in order to put this structure as a skeleton for enterprise information system creation the validity of interrelations types of business processes separate classes will be required.Methodology. The article uses the approach to the construction of the classification structure of the enterprise business processes by analyzing their role and place in the aggregate enterprise process model.Results. All the enterprise processes are suggested to subdivide into five groups: the basic business processes, the tool production business processes, support business processes, the operational control business processes, the business development processes. The topological properties and kinds of casual communication with other groups of business processes are defined for each business process group. These characteristics allow both to generate deeper classification of processes, and to analyze the degree of completeness and consistency formed in the course of numerous enterprise business processes classification.Conclusions. The stated approach was used in the practice of enterprise information systems architectures development, to identify business processes, as well as in teaching such disciplines as modeling enterprise architecture and business processes. Предмет. Обоснованная классификация дает возможность легче и полнее идентифицировать изучаемые объекты. Именно поэтому классификации лежат в основе структуры большинства практических искусственных систем, поскольку для сборки и описания связей отдельных компонентов требуется четкое представление о сущности этих компонентов, их свойствах и типовой принадлежности.Цель. Инжиниринг бизнес-процессов предприятия, их формирование как системы также базируются в своей основе на классификации. Но для того, чтобы заложить эту структуру в качестве скелета для создания информационной системы этого предприятия, потребуется обоснованность типов взаимосвязей отдельных классов бизнес-процессов.Методология. В статье используется подход к построению классификационной структуры бизнес-процессов предприятия путем анализа их роли и места в составе совокупной процессной модели этого предприятия.Результаты. Предлагается подразделять все процессы предприятия на пять групп: основные бизнес-процессы, вспомогательные бизнес-процессы, обслуживающие бизнес-процессы, бизнес-процессы оперативного управления, бизнес-процессы развития. Для каждой группы определяются топологические отличительные свойства и виды каузальных связей с другими группами бизнес-процессов. Эти характеристики позволяют как сформировать более глубокую классификацию процессов, так и анализировать степень полноты и непротиворечивости формируемого в процессе классификации множества бизнес-процессов предприятия.Выводы. Изложенный подход использовался в практике разработки архитектур информационных систем предприятий, для идентификации бизнес-процессов, а также в учебном процессе преподавания дисциплин по моделированию архитектуры предприятия и бизнес-процессов.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Ryzhko L. & А. Рыжко Л., 2018. "Каузальная классификация бизнес-процессов предприятия // Causal Сlassification of Enterprise Business," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 8(1), pages 90-99.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2018:i:1:p:90-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/141/142.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver Thomas & Michael Fellmann M.A., 2009. "Semantic Process Modeling – Design and Implementation of an Ontology-based Representation of Business Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(6), pages 438-451, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frederik Gailly & Nadejda Alkhaldi & Sven Casteleyn & Wouter Verbeke, 2017. "Recommendation-Based Conceptual Modeling and Ontology Evolution Framework (CMOE+)," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(4), pages 235-250, August.
    2. Michael Fellmann & Dirk Metzger & Sven Jannaber & Novica Zarvic & Oliver Thomas, 2018. "Process Modeling Recommender Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(1), pages 21-38, February.
    3. Jörg Becker & Patrick Delfmann & Hanns-Alexander Dietrich & Matthias Steinhorst & Mathias Eggert, 2016. "Business process compliance checking – applying and evaluating a generic pattern matching approach for conceptual models in the financial sector," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 359-405, April.
    4. José González Vázquez & Jürgen Sauer & Hans-Jürgen Appelrath, 2012. "Methods to Manage Information Sources for Software Product Managers in the Energy Market," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(1), pages 3-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2018:i:1:p:90-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://managementscience.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.