IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2015i1p16-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Социальное Государство И Партисипаторное Общество: Ложная Дилемма // The Welfare State And The Participatory Society: A False Dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • V. Lokosov V.

    (institute of social and economic studies of Population)

  • В. Локосов В.

    (институт социально-экономических проблем народонаселения)

Abstract

The welfare state is a basis of consolidation of the modern Russian society. Unfortunately, the polarization of society reproduces excessive inequality which is a barrier to the internal solidarity of the Russian nation, economic growth and development. The concept of «society participation» (participatory society) is being put forward as an alternative to the welfare state. It implies the reduction in social public spending given that the population participates in providing the funding for social programs. In market conditions, the government cannot be the only responsible for social issues; on the other hand, the problems of living standards improving and especially the fight against poverty cannot be resolved only by the citizens. The application of participatory approach and its integration into the public and local administration would provide a new opportunity for citizens to influence the management of the welfare state and participate in managing. Социальное государство представляет основу консолидации современного российского общества. К сожалению, сформированная поляризация общества воспроизводит избыточное неравенство, которое представляет препятствие для внутренней солидарности российской нации, экономического роста и развития. Выдвигаемая в качестве альтернативы социальному государству концепция «общества-участия» (participation society) предполагает сокращение социальных расходов государства и их перенос на население. В рыночных реалиях нельзя возлагать все надежды на решение социальных вопросов на государственную власть, вместе с тем, проблемы повышения качества жизни населения, и особенно борьба с бедностью, не могут решаться только за счет граждан. Реализация партисипаторного подхода, его встраивание для повышения качества жизни населения в систему государственного управления и местного самоуправления есть новая возможность для граждан влиять на управление социальным государством и участвовать в управлении.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Lokosov V. & В. Локосов В., 2015. "Социальное Государство И Партисипаторное Общество: Ложная Дилемма // The Welfare State And The Participatory Society: A False Dilemma," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, issue 1, pages 16-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2015:i:1:p:16-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/107/106.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 2003. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 691-705, August.
    2. ,, 2003. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 225-228, February.
    3. ,, 2003. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(5), pages 879-883, October.
    4. ,, 2003. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 411-413, April.
    5. ,, 2003. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 1195-1198, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yakut, Oguz, 2021. "Implementation of hydraulically driven barrel shooting control by utilizing artificial neural networks," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1206-1223.
    2. X. Qin & G. Huang, 2009. "An Inexact Chance-constrained Quadratic Programming Model for Stream Water Quality Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(4), pages 661-695, March.
    3. Md. Yousuf Gazi & Khandakar Tahmida Tafhim, 2019. "Investigation of Heavy-mineral Deposits Using Multispectral Satellite Imagery in the Eastern Coastal Margin of Bangladesh," Earth Sciences Malaysia (ESMY), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 16-22, October.
    4. Billionnet, Alain, 2011. "Solving the probabilistic reserve selection problem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 546-554.
    5. Minghe Sun, 2005. "Warm-Start Routines for Solving Augmented Weighted Tchebycheff Network Programs in Multiple-Objective Network Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 422-437, November.
    6. François Clautiaux & Cláudio Alves & José Valério de Carvalho & Jürgen Rietz, 2011. "New Stabilization Procedures for the Cutting Stock Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 530-545, November.
    7. Eichengreen, Barry & Kletzer, Kenneth & Mody, Ashoka, 2003. "Crisis Resolution: Next Steps," Santa Cruz Center for International Economics, Working Paper Series qt4cj974r4, Center for International Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    8. Tansel, Aysit & Karao?lan, Deniz, 2016. "The Causal Effect of Education on Health Behaviors: Evidence from Turkey," IZA Discussion Papers 10020, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Di Feng & Bettina Klaus, 2022. "Preference revelation games and strict cores of multiple‐type housing market problems," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 18(1), pages 61-76, March.
    10. Anna Scherbina, 2021. "Assessing the Optimality of a COVID Lockdown in the United States," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 177-201, July.
    11. John McKay, 2005. "How Significant and Effective are North Korea's "Market Reforms"?," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 83-97.
    12. Timothy K.M. Beatty & Erling Røed Larsen & Dag Einar Sommervoll, 2005. "Measuring the Price of Housing Consumption for Owners in the CPI," Discussion Papers 427, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    13. Marco Bianchi & Carlos Tapia & Ikerne del Valle, 2020. "Monitoring domestic material consumption at lower territorial levels: A novel data downscaling method," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1074-1087, October.
    14. Sonmez, Tayfun & Utku Unver, M., 2005. "House allocation with existing tenants: an equivalence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 153-185, July.
    15. Juarez, Ruben, 2013. "Group strategyproof cost sharing: The role of indifferences," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 218-239.
    16. Bustillo, Inés & Velloso, Helvia & Vézina, François, 2006. "The Canadian retirement income system," Documentos de Proyectos 3682, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    17. Melega, Gislaine Mara & de Araujo, Silvio Alexandre & Jans, Raf, 2018. "Classification and literature review of integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 1-19.
    18. Roth, Alvin E. & Sonmez, Tayfun & Utku Unver, M., 2005. "Pairwise kidney exchange," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 151-188, December.
    19. Martino Bardi & Peter Caines & Italo Capuzzo Dolcetta, 2013. "Preface: DGAA Special Issue on Mean Field Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 443-445, December.
    20. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5389 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Robert Hahn & Paul Tetlock, 2006. "A New Approach for Regulating Information Markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 265-281, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2015:i:1:p:16-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.