IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Стратегии Институциональных Реформ. Китай И Россия

  • Полтерович В.М.

Представлена вторая часть работы, посвященной проблеме выбора стратегии институциональной реформы. В первой части было введено понятие перспективной траектории, имеющей высокие шансы на успех благодаря выполнению определенных требований; их перечень был детально обоснован. В данной статье описанный ранее аналитический аппарат используется для сопоставления реформ в Китае и в России. Показано, что начальные условия не давали Китаю значительных преимуществ, однако китайские реформаторы в противоположность российским следовали теоретическим рекомендациям, выбирая в качестве стратегий перспективные траектории. Этот факт, с одной стороны, объясняет различие в результатах реформ, а с другой - является аргументом в пользу предлагаемой теории.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Центральный Экономико-Математический Институт (ЦЭМИ) in its journal Экономика и математические методы.

Volume (Year): 42 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 (апрель)
Pages:

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:scn:cememm:42-2-1
Note: Москва
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.cemi.rssi.ru/emm/home.htm

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Simeon Djankov, 1999. "Ownership Structure and Enterprise Restructuring in Six Newly Independent States," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 41(1), pages 75-95, April.
  2. Lawrence J. Lau & Yingyi Qian & Gerard Roland, 1997. "Reform without Losers: An Interpretation of China's Dual-Track Approach to Transition," Working Papers 97048, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
  3. Li, David D, 1998. "Changing Incentives of the Chinese Bureaucracy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(2), pages 393-97, May.
  4. Lawrence S�ez & Joy Yang, 2001. "The Deregulation of State-Owned Enterprises in India and China," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 43(3), pages 69-97, September.
  5. Yingyi Qian, 1999. "The Institutional Foundations of China's Market Transition," Working Papers 99011, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
  6. David D. Li, 1998. "Changing Incentives of the Chinese Bureaucracy," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 130, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:cememm:42-2-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sergei Parinov)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.