IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/031261/16967603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using production input and productivity of local shallot with the implementation of Good Agriculture practices in Donggala, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • CHRISTOPORUS C.
  • MUSTABJAD M.M.

    (Agricultural Economics Department, University of Brawijaya)

  • HANANI N.

    (Agricultural Economics Department, University of Brawijaya)

  • SYAFRIAL S.

    (Agricultural Economics Department, University of Brawijaya)

Abstract

The area of study is Tanantovea; a region located in Donggala Regency, Indonesia, towards 97 farmers participated in Good Agriculture Program (GAP) for local shallot agriculture that has met the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and 62 farmers who do not participate in the program. The purpose of the study is analyze the implementation of GAP towards production input between the farmers who participate in GAP and those who do not, and analyze partial productivity and Total Factor of Productivity (TFP) between the farmers who participate in GAP and those who do not. The t-test analyzes the production input shows that it is significant when α 1% two-tail test with probability rate of 0.000< 0.01; these indicate that there is different implementation of GAP towards production input between the farmers who participate in GAP and those who do not. The implementation of production input by GAP participants is higher than those the non-participants in that the participants are able to produce is 81.78% of seeds, 66.67% of organic fertilizer, 79.46% of inorganic fertilizer and 77.76% of pesticide. The amount of labor force by the GAP participants is 89.70 HOK or lower than the amount of labor force by non-participants that is 107.56 HOK. The t-test analyzing partial productivity shows that it is significant when α 10% in two-tailed test with probability rate of 0.052 < 0.10. These indicate there is different partial productivity between the farmers who participate in GAP and those who do not. The partial productivity of GAP participants is 6,289.25 kilograms per hectare and that of non-participants is 6,019.35 kilograms per hectare. For TFP, probability rate is 0.089 < 0.10 and the level of significance is 90% in two-tailed testing. These show significant difference in terms of TFP between the farmers who participate in GAP and those who do not. The average TFP of the GAP participants is 1.0076 kilogram per hectare and that of non-participant is 0.9622 kilograms per hectare.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoporus C. & Mustabjad M.M. & Hanani N. & Syafrial S., 2016. "Using production input and productivity of local shallot with the implementation of Good Agriculture practices in Donggala, Indonesia," Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, CyberLeninka;Редакция журнала Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, vol. 57(9), pages 33-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:031261:16967603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/using-production-input-and-productivity-of-local-shallot-with-the-implementation-of-good-agriculture-practices-in-donggala-indonesia
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:031261:16967603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CyberLeninka (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cyberleninka.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.