IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/031261/16082020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of the poverty and profitability status of adopters and non-adopters of sustainable taungya farming in ogun state

Author

Listed:
  • ABIOLA M.O.

    (Federal University of Agriculture)

  • OMIDIJI D.A.

    (Federal University of Agriculture)

  • UMEH D.N.

    (Federal University of Agriculture)

  • EDEWOR S.A.

    (Federal University of Agriculture)

  • ADEGOKE A.O.

    (Federal University of Agriculture)

Abstract

This paper investigates the comparative analysis of the poverty and profitability status of adopters and non-adopters of sustainable taungya farming in Ogun State, Nigeria. Multistage sampling procedure was employed for this study. At the first stage, primary data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey of 160 farmers drawn from a purposive selection of two Agricultural Development Programme (ADP) zones; Ijebu east and Ilaro zones. The second stage involved the proportionate selection of five blocks from the two ADP zones and at the third stage, four cells each were randomly selected per block. However, only 155 respondents who completed all the questionnaire items were actually used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics, Foster, Greer and Thorbecke Poverty Index, and Budgetary techniques were used for data analysis. Results revealed that 62.5% of the farmers adopted taungya farming as a form of agroforestry practice, while 34.3% of the farmers were non-adopters. The estimated relative poverty line was N2627.59 per week. Poverty incidence, depth and severity among the adopters were 30.1%, 6.8% and 0.4% respectively while they were 45.4%, 26.3% and 6.9% respectively for the non-adopters. The decomposition of the poverty status according to sub-groups was equally shown. The budgetary analysis showed that the net farm income of adopters which was N249,327/ha was significantly (p<0.05) different from that of the non-adopters which was N167,391/ha. The study concluded that taungya farming improved adopter’s welfare compared to non-adopters and accounted positively in reducing poverty. This study recommended that taungya farming should be encouraged to increase rural farmers’ income, and alleviate poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Abiola M.O. & Omidiji D.A. & Umeh D.N. & Edewor S.A. & Adegoke A.O., 2015. "Comparative analysis of the poverty and profitability status of adopters and non-adopters of sustainable taungya farming in ogun state," Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, CyberLeninka;Редакция журнала Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, vol. 39(3), pages 9-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:031261:16082020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/comparative-analysis-of-the-poverty-and-profitability-status-of-adopters-and-non-adopters-of-sustainable-taungya-farming-in-ogun-state
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:031261:16082020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CyberLeninka (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cyberleninka.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.