IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/00rbes/y2016i4p17-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Бережливое строительство и BIM-модель: дополняя друг друга для более эффективного управления проектами // Lean Construction and BIM: Complementing Each Other for Better Project Management

Author

Listed:
  • S. Eroshkin Y.

    (Plekhanov Russian University of Economics)

  • G. Kallaur Y.

    (Plekhanov Russian University of Economics)

  • L. Papikian M.

    (Plekhanov Russian University of Economics)

  • С. Ерошкин Ю.

    (Российский экономический университет имени Г.В. Плеханова)

  • Г. Каллаур Ю.

    (Российский экономический университет имени Г.В. Плеханова)

  • Л. Папикян М.

    (Российский экономический университет имени Г.В. Плеханова)

Abstract

Recently lean construction concept and building information modeling (BIM) have become one of most mainstream tools for solving many project management problems in construction. Thus, the purpose of this article is to investigate opportunities of increasing project management efficiency in construction by integrated use of lean construction principles and building information modeling. Results of contemporary research on lean construction and BIM were inspected. Analysis and synthesis methods were used to achieve the goals of this research. Knowledge of project management methodology was combined and matched to the known tools of lean construction and BIM to generate ways in which the latter can contribute to more efficient project management in the era of knowledge- based economy and rise of information technologies. The research has shown that the vast majority of lean construction principles can be practically realized with the use of BIM (eight of them - fully, four - partly, another four - none). The authors systematized the benefits of simultaneous application of Lean and BIM in existing knowledge fields of project management (project quality, risks, cost, time, scope, human resources, communications, procurement and stakeholders management). Lastly, the consequent link from lean principles to BIM to project management objectives and to overall business success were shown. The presented results correlate with ideas mentioned in most research on the topic. However, it is seen that more emphasis in the article unlike other research were put on the specific opportunities of lean and BIM application for project management. Thus, the results can be useful for further research of academics (especially in Russia, where this topic isn’t covered enough) as well as for project managers and other specialist in construction industry. В последнее время концепции бережливого строительства и информационного моделирования сооружений (BIM) стали основными инструментами решения ряда управленческих вопросов в строительстве. В статье предпринята попытка оценки возможности совместного использования обеих методов с целью повышения эффективности управления в строительстве. Результаты исследования показали, что большинство принципов, лежащих в основе концепции бережливого строительства, согласуются с принципами и методами информационного моделирования сооружений (восемь из них - полностью, четыре - частично, четыре - не согласуются). Авторы систематизировали преимущества совместного использования принципов обеих концепций в области управления проектами (качество проекта, риски, затраты, время, масштаб, человеческие ресурсы, коммуникации, снабжение и управление со стороны участников). Результаты исследования могут быть полезными для развития в России, как для дальнейших научных исследований, так и для практиков, управляющих проектами, а также для других специалистов строительных профессий.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Eroshkin Y. & G. Kallaur Y. & L. Papikian M. & С. Ерошкин Ю. & Г. Каллаур Ю. & Л. Папикян М., 2016. "Бережливое строительство и BIM-модель: дополняя друг друга для более эффективного управления проектами // Lean Construction and BIM: Complementing Each Other for Better Project Management," Review of Business and Economics Studies // Review of Business and Economics Studies, Финансовый Университет // Financial University, vol. 4(4), pages 17-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:00rbes:y:2016:i:4:p:17-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rbes.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/47/47.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:00rbes:y:2016:i:4:p:17-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rbes.fa.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.