Author
Listed:
- Замула, Ирина Валерьевна
(Житомирский государственный технологический университет)
- Прут, Татьяна Николаевна
(Житомирский государственный технологический университет)
- Семйон, Виктория Сергеевна
(ГВУЗ "Ужгородский национальный университет")
Abstract
The research has been aimed at determining advantages as well as disadvantages of existing methods of making the allowance for doubtful debts as well as at detecting the ways of determining the doubtfulness ratio with the purpose of forming the suggestions on whether the applying the offered methods by a specific company is expedient. The peculiarities of making the allowance for doubtful debts as well as the existing methods have been compared in the part of absolute amount of doubtful debts method and the method of applying the doubtfulness ratio by bad debts specific weight; according to the receivables classification by the terms of nonpayment; by specific weight of written off receivables in the amount of receivables at the beginning of appropriate period by previous three-five years have been determined as well as their advantages and disadvantages have been analyzed in the article. The ways of removing the contradictions between the NAS(P) 10 and NAS(P) 13 in the part of receivables estimation have been suggested. Исследования направлены на определение преимуществ и недостатков существующих методов создания резерва сомнительных долгов и способов определения коэффициента сомнительности с целью формирования предложений относительно целесообразности применения указанных методов конкретным предприятием. Определены особенности создания резерва сомнительных долгов, проведено сравнение существующих методов создания указанного резерва в части метода абсолютной суммы сомнительной задолженности и метода применения коэффициента сомнительности, и способов расчета коэффициента сомнительности: по удельному весу безнадежных долгов, по классификации дебиторской задолженности по срокам непогашения, по удельному весу списанной дебиторской задолженности в сумме дебиторской задолженности на начало соответствующего периода за предыдущие три–пять лет, а так же проанализированы их преимущества и недостатки. Предложены пути устранения противоречий между ПСБУ 10 и ПСБУ 13 в части оценки дебиторской задолженности.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:000pbo:49282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ольга Могиленко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pbo.ztu.edu.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.