IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/usvaep/v16y2016i2(24)p94-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating Pecuniary Gains And Environment Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Dacinia Crina PETRESCU

    (Faculty of Business, Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The initiation and development of the negotiation process is the result of the interaction between stimulating and hindering factors, among which there are perceived winning chances and perceived risk of projecting a negative image of himself/ herself. The objectives of the research were to observe the strength of people’s perception regarding these two variables and if they were influenced by the negotiation objective: a pecuniary one vs. an environmental one (both involving self-advocacy: aiming at personal benefits). From the point of view of the analyzed variables, people are good negotiators – they have high trust in winning chances and low fear of negative image, but they do not hold strong environmental concerns. The perceived winning chances were significantly higher (p 0.05).

Suggested Citation

  • Dacinia Crina PETRESCU, 2016. "Negotiating Pecuniary Gains And Environment Protection," The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 16(2(24)), pages 94-99, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:16:y:2016:i:2(24):p:94-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/USVAEPA_VOL.16,ISSUE_2(24),2016_fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:16:y:2016:i:2(24):p:94-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.