IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/usvaep/v15y2015i1(21)p271-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics In Public Administration. Case Study – Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Rãzvan VIORESCU

    (“Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania)

  • Gabriela NEMÞOI

    (“Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

Public services represent useful activities designated to meet a social need. The laws and regulations empower the activities of public services, without indicating the motives for public services. The impact of government in day to day life of citizens and communities is increasingly greater in terms of both public affairs management and budgetary aspect. The power to spend the community resources and to influence the lives of others means at the same time a great responsibility. That is the responsibility to act morally (with integrity) and ensure effective spending of resources. This means not to corrupt and do not let yourself be bribed, but it also means openness to dialogue with stakeholders, internal organizational climate of trust and cooperation, internal procedures to ensure ethical advise. In this sense, in the last 20 years, the public sector has developed legal rules or internal policies, procedures and organizational tools to ensure the integrity and responsible leadership. Public organizations have adopted and applied ethics codes, procedures regarding conflicts of interest, whistleblowing, declaring gifts and other measures to prevent corruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Rãzvan VIORESCU & Gabriela NEMÞOI, 2015. "Ethics In Public Administration. Case Study – Romania," The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 15(1(21)), pages 271-277, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:15:y:2015:i:1(21):p:271-277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/USVAEPA_VOL.15,ISSUE_1%2821%29,2015_fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:15:y:2015:i:1(21):p:271-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.