IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/usvaep/v12y2012i1(15)p238-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doctrinaire Controversies On The Concept Of Public Service

Author

Listed:
  • Irina BILOUSEAC

    () (,,Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

The article identifies the doctrinaire controversies existing in defining the public service. The main idea in defining the public service, as a an activity conducted or authorized by an administrative authority, is inextricably linked with the idea of general interest. In this context the public service must be considered as being an activity conducted by the public authorities in order to satisfy the general interests, because the public service appears only when the community points out some general need. We can say that the necessity of the public service establishment is justified by the existence of a general need, common to the entire human collectivity or to a certain collectivity. The term of public services was defined across the time from different perspectives, being used both by public management and administrative law. The notion of public service has appeared and developed constantly in the context of increasing the general needs of the human society. The problem of defining the concept of public service is, at the present, an extremely complex one, especially if we take into consideration the fact that, both through the content and through the modalities of organization, the public service represents a key component in building public administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina BILOUSEAC, 2012. "Doctrinaire Controversies On The Concept Of Public Service," The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 12(1(15)), pages 238-243, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:12:y:2012:i:1(15):p:238-243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/USVAEPA_VOL.12,ISSUE_1(15),2012
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:12:y:2012:i:1(15):p:238-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Liviu Scutariu). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.