IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

State Owned Enterprises As Object Of Transition And Structural Reforms In Cee: Theoretical Basis Of A Necessary Retrospective Analysis

Listed author(s):


    (University of Oradea, Romania)

  • Anca PACALA


    (University of Oradea, Romania)

At the beginning of the 9th decade, Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries were in a dilemma of epic proportions. Although the policy option was taken, the problems of transition just appeared for policy makers, scholars, as considerable challenge about the models and the way to be applied. Thus, Central and Eastern European countries became an immense laboratory for testing the theories of transition, as well as a place of political struggle, and results were highly contradictory. After more than two decades after that period, we found a clear dominance of neoclassical models, and an obvious passing – by of relevant points of view supported by the Austrian school. While the neoclassic focused on state's involvement in reforms, establishing new economy institutions, the Austrian school said that not the pace of reform is important but the order of actions and the establishment of property rights itself. For Romania, even if the reason and option of privatization were clear, we can say that unconditioned embrace of the neoclassical model in a developing economy rather than an economy in transition may be an explanation of the inconclusive, painful and often frustrating results of privatization and reform in Romania.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:,ISSUE_1(15),2012
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration in its journal The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration.

Volume (Year): 12 (2012)
Issue (Month): 1(15) (June)
Pages: 18-23

in new window

Handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:12:y:2012:i:1(15):p:18-23
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Universitatii 9, 720225; Suceava

Phone: +40 230 522978
Fax: +40 230 216147
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:usvaep:v:12:y:2012:i:1(15):p:18-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Liviu Scutariu)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.