IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/rdtusv/v7y2009i7p47-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safe-Tourism In Crisis Situations, Appreciations In Romania’S Case

Author

Listed:
  • Valentin HAPENCIUC

    (“Stefan cel Mare” University, Suceava, Romania)

  • Pavel STANCIU

    („Stefan cel Mare” University Suceava, Romania)

  • Iulian CONDRATOV

    (“Stefan cel Mare” University, Suceava, Romania)

  • Puiu NISTOREANU

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Economic crisis - is an intensively mediated concept during the past years- it issues with the situation when the business medium confronts with the perspective of a fundamental change, usually sudden and unexpected, that threatens to significantly disturb the present socio-economic perceptions and the daily practice. The emergent markets are the most vulnerable in crisis, they still adapt the easiest to the actual context, counting on economic flexible domains as the tourism industry or IT and even ecological agriculture in our country’s context. The persistence of global economic crisis, but especially the touristic market fragility makes it impossible to estimate the evolution of hospitality industry for the next years. Crisis effects seem to be inevitable in the context where great tourism actors talk about consequences similar to the ones following the terrorists attacks in USA, in September 2001. In this case it is very important to understand the stress factors that prevent the optimum development of tourism discouraging the touristic flow towards once well-known destinations. To us, regarding this fact, the importance growths as it must be admitted – with honesty, that Romania is not a touristic destination with a worldwide notoriety, not even European, but some issues like the localization outside those more and more unsafe touristic areas, the peacefulness regarding the terrorism implications and the special natural and anthrop potential, all these, might create the necessary premises for promoting a specific tourism, able to induce tourists the idea of security. Among the difficulties that Romania confronts itself with, we only mention: unfavourable international image, precarious touristic infrastructure estate only seldom application of quality standards. We appreciate that only if these deficiencies are assumed and controlled in the immediate future, then the interest for Romanian tourism will continuously increase and safe tourism could become a tourism start over factor after the wrong starts for the rural tourism, business tourism or watering tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentin HAPENCIUC & Pavel STANCIU & Iulian CONDRATOV & Puiu NISTOREANU, 2009. "Safe-Tourism In Crisis Situations, Appreciations In Romania’S Case," Revista de turism - studii si cercetari in turism / Journal of tourism - studies and research in tourism, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 7(7), pages 47-56, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:scm:rdtusv:v:7:y:2009:i:7:p:47-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadeturism.ro/index.php/rdt/article/download/114/83
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mihai TALMACIU & Irina Teodora MANOLESCU, 2022. "Enhancing competitiveness and resilience of tourism in crises condition. Experiences from Eastern Partnership countries," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13(4), pages 381-399, January.
    2. Mihai COSTEA & Cristian-Valentin HAPENCIUC & Pavel STANCIU, 2017. "Tourist Safety And Security: A Factor Of The Competitiveness Of Secondary Tourist Destinations," Revista de turism - studii si cercetari in turism / Journal of tourism - studies and research in tourism, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 23(23), pages 1-9, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:rdtusv:v:7:y:2009:i:7:p:47-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iulian Condratov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.