IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/ejafbu/v14y2020i24p139-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role Of Agriculture In The Romanian Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Camelia-Cătălina M1HALCIUC

    (Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229, Romania)

Abstract

As a basic branch of the national economy, agriculture asserts itself as a very complex and complicated field of activity, being one of the branches of great importance, so that it contributes to a great extent to the launch of the economic growth of our country. Agriculture like the other branches of the national economy develops according to the same economic legitimacies, but with specific forms of manifestation, determined by the existence of its technical and economic peculiarities, which gives a special complexity to economic phenomena in agriculture compared to the same economic phenomena industry. All these aspects led to the establishment of the basic objective of this paper, through which the author aims to make an analysis of the importance of agriculture at national level, highlighting the role and place of the agricultural sector in the Romanian economy based on statistical research, thus analyzing the share of enterprises active in agriculture in the total number of enterprises active in the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Camelia-Cătălina M1HALCIUC, 2020. "The Role Of Agriculture In The Romanian Economy," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 14(24), pages 139-145, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:scm:ejafbu:v:14:y:2020:i:24:p:139-145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accounting-management.ro/getpdf.php?paperid=24_18_
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Constantin ANGHELACHE & Mirela PANAIT, 2017. "Evolution Of Agricultural Activity In The European Union," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(6), pages 63-74, June.
    2. Liliana FELEAGĂ & Niculae FELEAGĂ & Vasile RĂILEANU, 2012. "Theoretical considerations about implementation of IAS 41 in Romania," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(2(567)), pages 31-38, February.
    3. Ciprian Apostol, 2015. "Performance Analysis Of Agricultural Activities In Romania In The Register Of Sustainable Development," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 58-63, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monica Laura ZLATI & Cristian MIRICA, 2021. "Biological Assets Accounting In The Agricultural Sector," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 15(25), pages 1-7, February.
    2. Fathi Maurits Muhamada & Erna Harnawati & Satria Yudhia Wijaya, 2021. "Accounting treatment analysis of agricultural activities in presenting financial statements based on PSAK 69 IN PT IJ," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 255-263, June.
    3. Saverio BOZZOLAN & Enrico LAGHI & Marco MATTEI, 2016. "Amendments to the IAS 41 and IAS 16 - implications for accounting of bearer plants," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(4), pages 160-166.
    4. Apostol Ciprian, 2017. "Analysis Of Performance From Processing And Preserving Of Fruit And Vegetables," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 52-56, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ejafbu:v:14:y:2020:i:24:p:139-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.