IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

General Framework Of Implementing Decision No. 2002/584/Jai On The European Arrest Warrant

Listed author(s):
  • Ana PÎRLAC


    (University “Stefan cel Mare” Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Public Administration)

Registered author(s):

    The European Union has given birth to a unique form of judicial cooperation in the field of criminal matters, freedom of movement creating new opportunities for the cross-border criminality. In such conditions, in order to face the new challengings, there has been established the aim of the maintainance and the development of a common space of freedom, secutiry and justice. The accomplishment of such desiderata has imposed simplified procedures of cooperation between the Member states consisting in recognition and compliance of court orders outside the state without the formalities stipulated in the classical conventions regarding the international legal assistance, which had been accomplished by adopting the Framework decision on the European arrest warrant. Yet, numerous institutional courts of the European states have faced difficulties on the concordance of certain provisions in the fundamental law and the implementation law of this present decision in what concerns the sovereignty of the states, the nationality exception, the principle of legality, the principle of dual criminality. Such objections have placed the European states in front of two contrary interests, on one side that of the European integration, of judicial cooperation in the field of criminal matters and of development of common space of freedom, security and justice, and on the other side, that of the preservation of national sovereignty and of the protection of own nationals. In such context, according sovereingty an absolute value means waiving interdependence, cooperation, and their lacking render the sovereginty useless. To this conclusion have came, without any reserve, the majority of the European states after the terrorist attacks in the United States of America on the 11th of September 2001, events which stood at the basis of the speediness of adopting and implementing the framework decision on the European arrest warrant.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:,nr.1(13),2011_fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration in its journal The Annals of the "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration.

    Volume (Year): 11 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1(13) (June)
    Pages: 348-354

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:11:y:2011:i:1(13):p:348-354
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Universitatii 9, 720225; Suceava

    Phone: +40 230 522978
    Fax: +40 230 216147
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:11:y:2011:i:1(13):p:348-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Liviu Scutariu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.