IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Choice For Social Discount Rate


  • Ioan Alin NISTOR

    () (Faculty of Business, “Babes-Bolyai” University Cluj-Napoca, Romania)


Discounting is used to mean any process of revaluing a future event, service or product, to give a present equivalent value (present value).While there are many ways of determining a discount rate for private investment, when it comes to governments, things turn more complicated. Sometimes data is elusive or hard to interpret or there might be inconsistencies among sets of stated and imputed discount rates. Therefore politically derived discount rates are a cause for doubt and are unlikely to reflect future values appropriately. Theories proved that the decision of individuals in their political capacity as citizens are unlike those made in their economic capacity as consumers. Experiments found that individuals chose a lower discount rate as being appropriate for public than for personal decisions. Discounting helps in the process of investment analysis and other decisions between present and future. Those who analyze projects need to judge which ones are worthwhile so they need to compare the value of early costs with that of benefits and values of cash flows expected to be received at different points in time. Only when all cash flows have been discounted to equivalent values at the same point in time can discounted benefits be evaluated. Looking at some examples and at the Rosia Montana Project, a large scale and long term project, the paper evaluates some of the “choices for social discount rate” raises some questions and brings suggestions towards the steps that the governments (and particular Romanian) should do, to bring objectivity and transparency in investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioan Alin NISTOR, 2011. "The Choice For Social Discount Rate," The Annals of the "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 11(1(13)), pages 154-158, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:11:y:2011:i:1(13):p:154-158

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:,nr.1(13),2011_fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Discount rate; risk; investment; social policy; decision;


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:11:y:2011:i:1(13):p:154-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Liviu Scutariu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.