IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/ausvfe/v10y2010i1(11)p194-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations On Interpretation Of Same Cases In Connection With Article 10 Of Patent Law No. 64/1991

Author

Listed:
  • Tiberiu-Octavian CUJBA

    () (“Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science)

Abstract

Invention is subject to Patent Law no. 64/1991. As a result of his activity, if the conditions required by law, the inventor receives a patent. For like to create a technique to be declared invention it must meet following conditions: is new, is the result of an inventive step and have industrial application. In connection with first condition, we present some significant cases and reviews of rigor.. Failure patenting an invention of the author's fault is the main cause ignorance of Patent Low having bad track. .Situations analyzed represent colors look the same, namely, that the inventor need to patent his invention and only then you can to popularize by different means which have access.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiberiu-Octavian CUJBA, 2010. "Considerations On Interpretation Of Same Cases In Connection With Article 10 Of Patent Law No. 64/1991," The Annals of the "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 10(1(11)), pages 194-199, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:10:y:2010:i:1(11):p:194-199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/ANNALS%20VOL.10,NR.1(11),2010%20fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    novelty; patent; priority; review; invention.;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ausvfe:v:10:y:2010:i:1(11):p:194-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Liviu Scutariu). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.