IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

A Tale of Two Theories: Foreign Direct Investment Decisions from the Perspectives of Economic and Institutional Theory

  • Sabine Böckem
  • Anja Tuschke
Registered author(s):

    We analyze foreign direct investment (FDI) from two theoretical perspectives: the traditional economic perspective and the more recent institutional perspective. By combining a theoretical analysis with empirical tests, we are able to explore the explanatory power of both economic and institutional reasons for FDI. Our results show that a firm’s decision to engage in a foreign market is influenced by the attractiveness of the target market and by prior FDI decisions of large and successful peers. Thus, both theoretical perspectives complement each other in explaining FDI. We believe that any research that ignores one or the other explanation suffers from a serious omission.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by LMU Munich School of Management in its journal Schmalenbach Business Review.

    Volume (Year): 62 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 3 (July)
    Pages: 260-290

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:62:y:2010:i:3:p:260-290
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Muenchen
    Phone: 0049 89 2180 2166
    Fax: 0049 89 2180 6327
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:62:y:2010:i:3:p:260-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (sbr)

    The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask sbr to update the entry or send us the correct address

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.