IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v8y1994i2p177-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formal Opportunity, Informal Barriers: Black Women Managers within a Local Authority

Author

Listed:
  • Sonia Liff

    (School of Industrial and Business Studies at Warwick University)

  • Karen Dale

    (University of Warwick's School of Industrial and Business Studies)

Abstract

This article examines the equal opportunities policies of a local authority which were intended to improve the representation of black women managers. It reports the types of initiatives and proportions of black women employed in different grades over time; and discusses the organisational context, contrasting the views of personnel and line managers, and EO specialists, with those of black women who had achieved senior positions. These latter accounts illustrated how inequalities were sustained despite, and at times in articulation with, an EO policy which was relatively successful in formal terms. Findings are discussed with reference to two criticisms made of EO policies: inadequate implementation, and a failure to redress the effects of social inequalities or challenge white, male work norms. The article suggests that increasing formal controls or the range of initiatives is insufficient: better ways of understanding and challenging the role of organisational structures, cultures and politics in sustaining inequality is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonia Liff & Karen Dale, 1994. "Formal Opportunity, Informal Barriers: Black Women Managers within a Local Authority," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 8(2), pages 177-198, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:8:y:1994:i:2:p:177-198
    DOI: 10.1177/095001709482002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001709482002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001709482002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:8:y:1994:i:2:p:177-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.