IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v4y1990i3p349-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender, Employment and Responsibilities to Kin

Author

Listed:
  • Janet Finch

    (Dept. of Social Administration Lancaster University LANCASTER LA1 4YF)

  • Jennifer Mason

    (Dept. of Social Administration Lancaster University LANCASTER LA1 4YF)

Abstract

This article is concerned with conflicts of interest between people's commitment to employment and their responsibilities to kin, especially for the care of elderly relatives. Questions are raised about what is generally seen as the appropriate balance of priorities, and how such priorities and conflicts are actually handled and resolved in kin groups, by women in particular. The paper draws on both quantitative and qualitative data from a study of family obligations. The authors argue that choices between either maintaining or giving up employment to care for kin rarely arise in such stark form for a variety of reasons. When they do, however, compromise strategies tend to be sought which protect existing employment whilst at the same time enabling people to take some responsibility for their kin. Women's jobs, as well as men's, can be protected in these circumstances and this is widely approved of at the normative level. It is likely that in the future, if more women are encouraged into the labour market, and if they develop consistent employment patterns, many more may need to generate compromise strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Janet Finch & Jennifer Mason, 1990. "Gender, Employment and Responsibilities to Kin," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 4(3), pages 349-367, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:4:y:1990:i:3:p:349-367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/4/3/349.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:4:y:1990:i:3:p:349-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.