IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v40y2026i3p396-420.html

Fixed-term Employment and Subjective Well-being: A Comparison of Natives, Migrants and Refugees

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Goßner

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Germany)

  • Maye Ehab

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Germany and University of Bamberg, Germany)

Abstract

This article examines the impact of fixed-term employment on subjective well-being among natives, migrants and refugees in Germany and the underlying mechanisms of this relationship. Utilizing longitudinal data from 2016 to 2021, we employ fixed-effects panel models and mediation analyses. We find that refugees experience stronger negative effects of fixed-term employment on their well-being than natives and migrants, especially shortly after their arrival. For migrants and natives, subjective job insecurity significantly mediates these effects, while it is less relevant for refugees. Our results indicate that it is essential to acknowledge the heterogeneous effects for vulnerable groups when studying the impact of fixed-term employment. During their integration process, refugees encounter complex labour market challenges which can pose threats to their subjective well-being. Therefore, we suggest engaging more in debates about non-standard forms of employment and taking aspects of the quality of employment into account when designing integration measures for this group.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Goßner & Maye Ehab, 2026. "Fixed-term Employment and Subjective Well-being: A Comparison of Natives, Migrants and Refugees," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 40(3), pages 396-420, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:396-420
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170251393618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170251393618
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170251393618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:396-420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.