IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v40y2026i2p314-336.html

Autonomy’s Mirage: How Fauxtonomy Fuels Workers’ Frustration in the Gig Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Ward van Zoonen

    (VU University, The Netherlands
    University of Jyväskylä, Finland)

  • Anu E Sivunen

    (University of Jyväsylä, Finland)

Abstract

This study explores how the interplay between perceived autonomy and dependence in online crowdwork shapes workers’ perceptions of fairness and frustration. Promises of autonomy entice workers to crowdwork, yet these promises often mask deeper dependencies on platforms and requesters. This study finds that high autonomy, when coupled with high dependence, may have adverse effects on fairness and frustration. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between autonomy and dependence in online crowdwork. Workers with low autonomy are less affected by dependence, while those with high autonomy are more likely to perceive platforms as operating unfairly when coupled with high dependence. These findings support the fauxtonomy hypothesis, demonstrating how autonomy, under conditions of dependence, creates a sense of false self-employment and amplifies worker frustration. Addressing these disparities is critical to ensuring fair treatment and reducing frustration among platform workers, especially for those who feel trapped in high-dependence situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ward van Zoonen & Anu E Sivunen, 2026. "Autonomy’s Mirage: How Fauxtonomy Fuels Workers’ Frustration in the Gig Economy," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 40(2), pages 314-336, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:314-336
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170251380739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170251380739
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170251380739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. González-Gómez, Helena V. & Hudson, Sarah, 2024. "Employee frustration with information systems: Appraisals and resources," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 425-436.
    2. James Hickson, 2024. "Freedom, domination and the gig economy," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 321-336, March.
    3. Khan, Ali Nawaz & Khan, Naseer Abbas, 2024. "The gig economy's secret weapon: ChatGPT," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Natalia A. Vershinina & Peter Rodgers & Monder Ram & Nick Theodorakopoulos & Yulia Rodionova, 2018. "False self†employment: the case of Ukrainian migrants in London's construction sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 2-18, January.
    5. van Zoonen, Ward & Sivunen, Anu E., 2024. "Understanding the viability conundrum in online crowdwork: The costs of unprecedented autonomy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Galanis, Giorgos & Veneziani, Roberto & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2019. "The dynamics of inequalities and unequal exchange of labor in intertemporal linear economies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 29-46.
    7. Corinna Funke & Georg Picot, 2021. "Platform work in a Coordinated Market Economy," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 348-363, July.
    8. Gerber, Christine, 2021. "Community building on crowdwork platforms: Autonomy and control of online workers?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 25(2), pages 190-211.
    9. Ryan A Morgan & Ward van Zoonen & Claartje ter Hoeven, 2023. "Lost in the crowd? An investigation into where microwork is conducted and classifying worker types," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(3), pages 301-322, September.
    10. Ana Alacovska & Eliane Bucher & Christian Fieseler, 2024. "A Relational Work Perspective on the Gig Economy: Doing Creative Work on Digital Labour Platforms," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 161-179, February.
    11. Will Sutherland & Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi & Michael Dunn & Sarah Beth Nelson, 2020. "Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 457-475, June.
    12. Premilla D’Cruz & Shuili Du & Ernesto Noronha & K. Praveen Parboteeah & Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich & Glen Whelan, 2022. "Technology, Megatrends and Work: Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 879-902, October.
    13. Christian Fieseler & Eliane Bucher & Christian Pieter Hoffmann, 2019. "Unfairness by Design? The Perceived Fairness of Digital Labor on Crowdworking Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 987-1005, June.
    14. Mujtaba Ahsan, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Ethics in the Sharing Economy: A Critical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 19-33, January.
    15. Juliet B Schor & Christopher Tirrell & Steven Peter Vallas, 2024. "Consent and Contestation: How Platform Workers Reckon with the Risks of Gig Labor," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(5), pages 1423-1444, October.
    16. Katie Cruz & Kate Hardy & Teela Sanders, 2017. "False Self-Employment, Autonomy and Regulating for Decent Work: Improving Working Conditions in the UK Stripping Industry," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 274-294, June.
    17. Bader, Verena & Kaiser, Stephan, 2017. "Autonomy and Control? How Heterogeneous Sociomaterial Assemblages Explain Paradoxical Rationalities in the Digital Workplace," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 28(3), pages 338-358.
    18. Michele Cantarella & Chiara Strozzi, 2021. "Workers in the crowd: the labor market impact of the online platform economy [An evaluation of instrumental variable strategies for estimating the effects of catholic schooling]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(6), pages 1429-1458.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frédéric Bally & Albane Grandazzi & Hélène Picard & Thibault Daudigeos, 2025. "Digital and Disembedded? Questioning the Territorial Embeddedness of Local Digital Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(2), pages 265-285, October.
    2. van Zoonen, Ward & Sivunen, Anu E., 2024. "Understanding the viability conundrum in online crowdwork: The costs of unprecedented autonomy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Yao, Qiongrui (Missy) & Baker, LaKami T. & Lohrke, Franz T., 2022. "Building and sustaining trust in remote work by platform-dependent entrepreneurs on digital labor platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 327-339.
    4. Melinda Timea Fülöp & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Dan Ioan Topor, 2025. "Digital business world and ethical dilemmas: a systematic literature review," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 23-41, March.
    5. Zamani, Efpraxia D. & Spanaki, Konstantina, 2023. "Affective temporal experiences and new work modalities: The role of Information and Communication Technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Valeria Pulignano & Karol Muszyński & Maite Tapia, 2024. "Variations of Freelancers’ “Effort-Bargain†Experiences in Platform Work: The Role of Skills," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(5), pages 742-769, October.
    7. Haoyu Xie & Alessandro Checco & Efpraxia D. Zamani, 2024. "The Unintended Consequences of Automated Scripts in Crowdwork Platforms: A Simulation Study in MTurk," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 159-175, February.
    8. Li, Sihui & Zhang, Lanxia & Hu, Shoufeng & Jia, Fu & Fu, Xiaolan, 2025. "Gig work: A bibliometric systematic literature review and content analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Colin C. Williams, 2023. "A Modern Guide to the Informal Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18668.
    10. Mikko Hänninen & Anssi Smedlund, 2021. "Same Old Song with a Different Melody: The Paradox of Market Reach and Financial Performance on Digital Platforms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1832-1868, November.
    11. Pramukh Nanjundaswamy Vasist & Satish Krishnan, 2025. "Navigating the Ethical Terrain Around the Challenges of Fake News and False Narratives: An Integrative Literature Review and a Proposed Agenda for Future Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 196(2), pages 473-493, January.
    12. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    13. Gonzalez-Cabello, Martin & Siddiq, Auyon & Corbett, Charles J. & Hu, Catherine, 2025. "Fairness in crowdwork: Making the human AI supply chain more humane," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 645-657.
    14. Niki Panteli & Andriana Rapti & Dora Scholarios, 2020. "‘If He Just Knew Who We Were’: Microworkers’ Emerging Bonds of Attachment in a Fragmented Employment Relationship," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 476-494, June.
    15. Philip Hancock & Melissa Tyler & Mark Godiva, 2021. "Thursday Night and a Sing-along ‘Sung Alone’: The Experiences of a Self-employed Performer During the Pandemic," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(6), pages 1155-1166, December.
    16. Alex Chernoff & Gabriela Galassi, 2023. "Digitalization: Labour Markets," Discussion Papers 2023-16, Bank of Canada.
    17. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-04050331 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Ana Alacovska & Eliane Bucher & Christian Fieseler, 2024. "A Relational Work Perspective on the Gig Economy: Doing Creative Work on Digital Labour Platforms," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 161-179, February.
    19. Soh Kaneko & Naoki Yoshihara, 2018. "On the General Impossibility of Persistent Unequal Exchange Free Trade Equilibria in the Pre-industrial World Economy," Working Papers SDES-2018-19, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Dec 2018.
    20. Walter Leal Filho & David Anthony Kirby & Tiago F. A. C. Sigahi & Ricardo L. F. Bella & Rosley Anholon & Osvaldo L. G. Quelhas, 2025. "Higher education and sustainable entrepreneurship: The state of the art and a look to the future," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 957-969, February.
    21. Ian Clark & James Hunter & Richard Pickford & Huw Fearnall-Williams, 2022. "How do licensing regimes limit worker interests? Evidence from informal employment in Britain," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 431-449, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:314-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.