IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v40y2026i2p314-336.html

Autonomy’s Mirage: How Fauxtonomy Fuels Workers’ Frustration in the Gig Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Ward van Zoonen

    (VU University, The Netherlands
    University of Jyväskylä, Finland)

  • Anu E Sivunen

    (University of Jyväsylä, Finland)

Abstract

This study explores how the interplay between perceived autonomy and dependence in online crowdwork shapes workers’ perceptions of fairness and frustration. Promises of autonomy entice workers to crowdwork, yet these promises often mask deeper dependencies on platforms and requesters. This study finds that high autonomy, when coupled with high dependence, may have adverse effects on fairness and frustration. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between autonomy and dependence in online crowdwork. Workers with low autonomy are less affected by dependence, while those with high autonomy are more likely to perceive platforms as operating unfairly when coupled with high dependence. These findings support the fauxtonomy hypothesis, demonstrating how autonomy, under conditions of dependence, creates a sense of false self-employment and amplifies worker frustration. Addressing these disparities is critical to ensuring fair treatment and reducing frustration among platform workers, especially for those who feel trapped in high-dependence situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ward van Zoonen & Anu E Sivunen, 2026. "Autonomy’s Mirage: How Fauxtonomy Fuels Workers’ Frustration in the Gig Economy," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 40(2), pages 314-336, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:314-336
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170251380739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170251380739
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170251380739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:314-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.