IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v40y2026i2p273-294.html

Diamonds in the Rough: How Social Class Difference is (De)Valued in Elite Accountancy Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Louise Ashley

    (Queen Mary University of London, UK)

  • Hilary Sommerlad

    (University of Leeds, UK)

Abstract

Professional Service Firms (PSFs) rely on their socially exclusive approach to recruitment as a source of cultural capital and social prestige, but recent developments have obliged them to implement a more inclusive recruitment policy. The resulting contradiction between exclusivity and inclusivity has accentuated pre-existing tensions inherent to professions’ claim to high status and their supposed social detachment. Drawing from a UK government commissioned study examining attitudes towards socio-economic diversity in elite PSFs, we use critical discursive psychology to analyse and illustrate how these tensions are managed in talk. Empirically, this illustrates that interviewees draw on contradictory ‘interpretative repertoires’ to present themselves and their firms as balanced and fair, thereby helping to legitimate their continuing use of exclusionary practices. We interpret these findings theoretically using the work of Bourdieu, to highlight how the location of firms within overlapping fields limits professionals’ agency to challenge the status quo.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise Ashley & Hilary Sommerlad, 2026. "Diamonds in the Rough: How Social Class Difference is (De)Valued in Elite Accountancy Firms," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 40(2), pages 273-294, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:273-294
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170251380025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170251380025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170251380025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:273-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.